Review Process

Review Process

Our journal follows a double-blind peer review system where both reviewer and author identities remain concealed throughout the review process.

1. Initial Assessment
The Editor-in-Chief conducts an initial review to assess the manuscript's suitability, adherence to journal guidelines, and research quality. Manuscripts may be rejected at this stage if they have serious flaws, lack originality, or fall outside the journal's scope.

2. Peer Review
Qualified manuscripts are sent to two expert reviewers who evaluate:
- Originality and contribution
- Research methodology
- Clarity and structure
- Ethical considerations
- Documentation and references

Reviewers provide recommendations:
- Accept without changes
- Accept with minor revisions (1 week revision time)
- Accept with major revisions (2 weeks revision time)
- Reject

3. Final Decision
After revisions, the Editor reviews the updated manuscript against reviewer comments. Further revisions may be requested, or the manuscript may be rejected if revisions are inadequate.

4. Production
Accepted manuscripts undergo copyediting and layout editing before online publication.