Gemini versus ChatGPT: applications, performance, architecture, capabilities, and implementation
Keywords:
Large language models, Generative Artificial Intelligence, ChatGPT, Gemini, Performance, Architecture, Capabilities.Abstract
This research paper presents an in-depth comparative examination of Gemini and ChatGPT, two prominent conversational AI models, exploring their respective applications, performance metrics, architectural variances, and overall capabilities. As conversational AI becomes increasingly prevalent across industries, comprehending the nuances of these models becomes pivotal for effective deployment. The paper initiates by outlining the wide array of applications for both Gemini and ChatGPT, spanning industries such as customer service, construction, finance, education, healthcare, and entertainment. It analyzes how each model addresses specific use cases, emphasizing their flexibility and potential impact across different sectors. Following this, the study assesses the performance of Gemini and ChatGPT through both empirical benchmarks and real-world deployment scenarios. Key metrics, including response coherence, accuracy, latency, and scalability, are scrutinized to gauge the models' ability to generate contextually appropriate and coherent responses in conversational contexts. Moreover, the paper elucidates the architectural distinctions between Gemini and ChatGPT, covering variances in training methodologies, model architectures, and underlying technologies. Understanding these architectural nuances provides deeper insights into the computational mechanisms underpinning each model's performance. Lastly, the paper explores the capabilities of Gemini and ChatGPT in handling complex linguistic phenomena, deciphering user intents, and sustaining engaging dialogues over prolonged interactions. This discussion encompasses language generation, sentiment analysis, context retention, and ethical considerations, shedding light on the potential of these models to facilitate meaningful human-computer interactions. Through this thorough comparative analysis, the research contributes to the ongoing conversation surrounding conversational AI systems. It offers valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of Gemini and ChatGPT, empowering stakeholders to make informed decisions regarding their optimal utilization across diverse applications.
Downloads
References
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., ... & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and individual differences, 103, 102274.
Chang, Y., Wang, X., Wang, J., Wu, Y., Yang, L., Zhu, K., ... & Xie, X. (2023). A survey on evaluation of large language models. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology.
Thirunavukarasu, A. J., Ting, D. S. J., Elangovan, K., Gutierrez, L., Tan, T. F., & Ting, D. S. W. (2023). Large language models in medicine. Nature medicine, 29(8), 1930-1940.
Wei, J., Tay, Y., Bommasani, R., Raffel, C., Zoph, B., Borgeaud, S., ... & Fedus, W. (2022). Emergent abilities of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.07682.
Kandpal, N., Deng, H., Roberts, A., Wallace, E., & Raffel, C. (2023, July). Large language models struggle to learn long-tail knowledge. In International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 15696-15707). PMLR.
Perera, P., & Lankathilake, M. (2023). Preparing to revolutionize education with the multi-model GenAI tool Google Gemini? A journey towards effective policy making. J. Adv. Educ. Philos, 7, 246-253.
McIntosh, T. R., Susnjak, T., Liu, T., Watters, P., & Halgamuge, M. N. (2023). From google gemini to openai q*(q-star): A survey of reshaping the generative artificial intelligence (ai) research landscape. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.10868.
Wu, T., He, S., Liu, J., Sun, S., Liu, K., Han, Q. L., & Tang, Y. (2023). A brief overview of ChatGPT: The history, status quo and potential future development. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 10(5), 1122-1136.
Zhong, Q., Ding, L., Liu, J., Du, B., & Tao, D. (2023). Can chatgpt understand too? a comparative study on chatgpt and fine-tuned bert. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.10198.
Kocoń, J., Cichecki, I., Kaszyca, O., Kochanek, M., Szydło, D., Baran, J., ... & Kazienko, P. (2023). ChatGPT: Jack of all trades, master of none. Information Fusion, 101861.
Biswas, S. S. (2023). Role of chat gpt in public health. Annals of biomedical engineering, 51(5), 868-869.
Firat, M. (2023). How chat GPT can transform autodidactic experiences and open education. Department of Distance Education, Open Education Faculty, Anadolu Unive.
Team, G., Anil, R., Borgeaud, S., Wu, Y., Alayrac, J. B., Yu, J., ... & Ahn, J. (2023). Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805.
Saeidnia, H. R. (2023). Welcome to the Gemini era: Google DeepMind and the information industry. Library Hi Tech News, (ahead-of-print).
Fu, C., Zhang, R., Lin, H., Wang, Z., Gao, T., Luo, Y., ... & Ji, R. (2023). A challenger to gpt-4v? early explorations of gemini in visual expertise. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.12436.
Wang, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2023). Gemini in Reasoning: Unveiling Commonsense in Multimodal Large Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.17661.
Lund, B. D., & Wang, T. (2023). Chatting about ChatGPT: how may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries?. Library Hi Tech News, 40(3), 26-29
Zhou, J., Ke, P., Qiu, X., Huang, M., & Zhang, J. (2023). ChatGPT: potential, prospects, and limitations. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 1-6.
Wei, X., Cui, X., Cheng, N., Wang, X., Zhang, X., Huang, S., ... & Han, W. (2023). Zero-shot information extraction via chatting with chatgpt. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.10205.
Adeshola, I., & Adepoju, A. P. (2023). The opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT in education. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-14.
Biswas, S. S. (2023). Potential use of chat gpt in global warming. Annals of biomedical engineering, 51(6), 1126-1127.
Zhu, J. J., Jiang, J., Yang, M., & Ren, Z. J. (2023). ChatGPT and environmental research. Environmental Science & Technology.
Watters, C., & Lemanski, M. K. (2023). Universal skepticism of ChatGPT: a review of early literature on chat generative pre-trained transformer. Frontiers in Big Data, 6.
Iyengar, K. P., Yousef, M. M. A., Nune, A., Sharma, G. K., & Botchu, R. (2023). Perception of chat generative pre-trained transformer (Chat-GPT) AI tool amongst MSK clinicians. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 44, 102253.
Setiawan, D., Karuniawati, E. A. D., & Janty, S. I. (2023). Peran Chat Gpt (Generative Pre-Training Transformer) Dalam Implementasi Ditinjau Dari Dataset. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(3), 9527-9539.
Zhou, J., Ke, P., Qiu, X., Huang, M., & Zhang, J. (2023). ChatGPT: potential, prospects, and limitations. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 1-6.
Wu, T., He, S., Liu, J., Sun, S., Liu, K., Han, Q. L., & Tang, Y. (2023). A brief overview of ChatGPT: The history, status quo and potential future development. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 10(5), 1122-1136.
Zhang, Y., Pei, H., Zhen, S., Li, Q., & Liang, F. (2023). Chat generative pre-trained transformer (ChatGPT) usage in healthcare. Gastroenterology & Endoscopy, 1(3), 139-143.
Prieto, S. A., Mengiste, E. T., & García de Soto, B. (2023). Investigating the use of ChatGPT for the scheduling of construction projects. Buildings, 13(4), 857.
Uddin, S. J., Albert, A., Ovid, A., & Alsharef, A. (2023). Leveraging ChatGPT to Aid Construction Hazard Recognition and Support Safety Education and Training. Sustainability, 15(9), 7121.
Rane, N. (2023). ChatGPT and similar Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) for building and construction industry: Contribution, Opportunities and Challenges of large language Models for Industry 4.0, Industry 5.0, and Society 5.0. Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Industry, 4.
Hatoum, M. B., & Nassereddine, H. (2023). Unleashing the power of chatgpt for lean construction: an early outlook. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC31). https://doi. org/10.24928/2023/0243.
Rane, N., Choudhary, S., & Rane, J. (2023). Integrating Building Information Modelling (BIM) with ChatGPT, Bard, and similar generative artificial intelligence in the architecture, engineering, and construction industry: applications, a novel framework, challenges, and future scope. Bard, and similar generative artificial intelligence in the architecture, engineering, and construction industry: applications, a novel framework, challenges, and future scope (November 22, 2023).
Wu, T., He, S., Liu, J., Sun, S., Liu, K., Han, Q. L., & Tang, Y. (2023). A brief overview of ChatGPT: The history, status quo and potential future development. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 10(5), 1122-1136.
Rane, N. (2023). Role of ChatGPT and similar generative artificial intelligence (AI) in construction industry. Available at SSRN 4598258.
Lakhani, A. (2023). Enhancing Customer Service with ChatGPT Transforming the Way Businesses Interact with Customers.
Subagja, A. D., Ausat, A. M. A., Sari, A. R., Wanof, M. I., & Suherlan, S. (2023). Improving Customer Service Quality in MSMEs through the Use of ChatGPT. Jurnal Minfo Polgan, 12(2), 380-386.
George, A. S., & George, A. H. (2023). A review of ChatGPT AI's impact on several business sectors. Partners Universal International Innovation Journal, 1(1), 9-23.
Zierock, B., & Jungblut, A. (2023). Leveraging Prompts for Improving AI-Powered Customer Service Platforms: A Case Study of Chat GPT and Midjourney. Learning, 116, 63-76.
Limna, P., & Kraiwanit, T. (2023). The role of chatgpt on customer service in the hospitality industry: An exploratory study of hospitality workers' experiences and perceptions. Tourism and hospitality management, 29(4), 583-592.
Kalla, D., & Smith, N. (2023). Study and Analysis of Chat GPT and its Impact on Different Fields of Study. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 8(3).
Rathore, B. (2023). Future of AI & generation alpha: ChatGPT beyond boundaries. Eduzone: International Peer Reviewed/Refereed Multidisciplinary Journal, 12(1), 63-68.
Dowling, M., & Lucey, B. (2023). ChatGPT for (finance) research: The Bananarama conjecture. Finance Research Letters, 53, 103662.
Rane, N. (2023). Role and Challenges of ChatGPT and Similar Generative Artificial Intelligence in Finance and Accounting. Available at SSRN 4603206.
Cao, Y., & Zhai, J. (2023). Bridging the gap–the impact of ChatGPT on financial research. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 1-15.
Khan, M. S., & Umer, H. (2024). ChatGPT in finance: Applications, challenges, and solutions. Heliyon.
Wenzlaff, K., & Spaeth, S. (2022). Smarter than Humans? Validating how OpenAI’s ChatGPT model explains Crowdfunding, Alternative Finance and Community Finance. Validating how OpenAI’s ChatGPT model explains Crowdfunding, Alternative Finance and Community Finance.(December 22, 2022).
Fatouros, G., Soldatos, J., Kouroumali, K., Makridis, G., & Kyriazis, D. (2023). Transforming sentiment analysis in the financial domain with ChatGPT. Machine Learning with Applications, 14, 100508.
Lo, A. W., Singh, M., Musumeci, J., Nagy, Z., Giese, G., Wang, X., ... & Mesomeris, S. (2023). From ELIZA to ChatGPT: The Evolution of Natural Language Processing and Financial Applications. The Journal of Portfolio Management.
Zhang, X., & Yang, Q. (2023, October). Xuanyuan 2.0: A large chinese financial chat model with hundreds of billions parameters. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (pp. 4435-4439).
Adeshola, I., & Adepoju, A. P. (2023). The opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT in education. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-14.
Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ansah, L. O. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52-62.
Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410.
Firat, M. (2023). How chat GPT can transform autodidactic experiences and open education. Department of Distance Education, Open Education Faculty, Anadolu Unive.
Elbanna, S., & Armstrong, L. (2024). Exploring the integration of ChatGPT in education: adapting for the future. Management & Sustainability: An Arab Review, 3(1), 16-29.
Rahman, M. M., & Watanobe, Y. (2023). ChatGPT for education and research: Opportunities, threats, and strategies. Applied Sciences, 13(9), 5783.
Pradana, M., Elisa, H. P., & Syarifuddin, S. (2023). Discussing ChatGPT in education: A literature review and bibliometric analysis. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2243134.
Biswas, S. (2023). Role of Chat GPT in Education. Available at SSRN 4369981.
Vaishya, R., Misra, A., & Vaish, A. (2023). ChatGPT: Is this version good for healthcare and research?. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, 17(4), 102744.
Li, J., Dada, A., Puladi, B., Kleesiek, J., & Egger, J. (2024). ChatGPT in healthcare: a taxonomy and systematic review. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 108013.
Sallam, M. (2023, March). ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. In Healthcare (Vol. 11, No. 6, p. 887). MDPI.
Cascella, M., Montomoli, J., Bellini, V., & Bignami, E. (2023). Evaluating the feasibility of ChatGPT in healthcare: an analysis of multiple clinical and research scenarios. Journal of Medical Systems, 47(1), 33.
Sallam, M. (2023). The utility of ChatGPT as an example of large language models in healthcare education, research and practice: Systematic review on the future perspectives and potential limitations. medRxiv, 2023-02.
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., & Singh, R. P. (2023). ChatGPT for healthcare services: An emerging stage for an innovative perspective. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 3(1), 100105.
Eysenbach, G. (2023). The role of ChatGPT, generative language models, and artificial intelligence in medical education: a conversation with ChatGPT and a call for papers. JMIR Medical Education, 9(1), e46885.
Ray, P. P. (2023). ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems.
Stahl, B. C., & Eke, D. (2024). The ethics of ChatGPT–Exploring the ethical issues of an emerging technology. International Journal of Information Management, 74, 102700.
Guleria, A., Krishan, K., Sharma, V., & Kanchan, T. (2023). ChatGPT: ethical concerns and challenges in academics and research. The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, 17(09), 1292-1299.
Wang, C., Liu, S., Yang, H., Guo, J., Wu, Y., & Liu, J. (2023). Ethical considerations of using ChatGPT in health care. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e48009.
Rane, N. L., Choudhary, S. P., Tawde, A., & Rane, J. (2023). ChatGPT is not capable of serving as an author: ethical concerns and challenges of large language models in education. International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science, 5(10), 851-874.
Balmer, A. (2023). A Sociological Conversation with ChatGPT about AI Ethics, Affect and Reflexivity. Sociology, 00380385231169676.
Dave, T., Athaluri, S. A., & Singh, S. (2023). ChatGPT in medicine: an overview of its applications, advantages, limitations, future prospects, and ethical considerations. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 6, 1169595.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
